June 11, 2000
          
            As I mentioned previously, last time Canada went to war with the 
              US, we made an honest attempt to burn the White House. Of course, Canada wasn't 
              properly a country then -- it would not be formally incorporated 
              until 1867 with the British North America Act -- and it wasn't the 
              White House yet either, not until it was whitewashed to cover the 
              scorch marks. Britannica calls it a British raiding 
              party, which is a bit like calling Alexander the Great a Pelasgian. 
          
           I am speaking of the most unpopular war in American history, being 
            the War of 1812, a war so traumatic it has to be relived at every 
            sporting event in Star Spangled form, though not formally until 1931. As a sidenote, 
            we didn't get a formal anthem in Canada until 1980; we might've had a coupon for a 
            free anthem with every Bill of Rights. 
          
 It's odd that a country as militant and powerful as the US would 
            have an anthem based on one of its few unsuccessful military campaigns. 
            The War of 1812 was less popular than Vietnam and the results no better 
            than a draw. Yet every time a President is sworn in, every World Series, 
            and every Olympic gold medal commemorates a bizarre holding action 
            that nobody was all that interested in perpetrating at the time. 
          
 The Canadian national anthem lyrics were originally a French poem 
            by a French justice set to music first performed in Montreal on June 
            24, St. Jean-Baptiste Day, 1880. Various translations to English appeared, 
            with the least militant or religious one coming from another judge 
            in 1908. This would become the official English version, likely by 
            virtue of being much duller than the original French, which had nobody 
            "on guard for thee" but an enthusiastic endorsement of making "thy 
            arm ready to wield the sword". 
          
 Neither country shows a glamourous face with its anthems, but the 
            face shown is the commonest. America comes off violent as hell -- 
            but victorious-by-the-grace-of-God-and-much-appreciated-thanks. Canada 
            appears either to be a quiet little enclave with no ambitions beyond 
            maintaining the frozen wasteland that it's pretty damn interested 
            in, or, to the French, to have a history "of the most brilliant exploits", 
            which is about generic-par as anthems go. "O Canada" also comes from 
            Québec. Québec has also produced more prime ministers 
            than any other province, despite not having the largest population 
            base, yet still feels it has been so badly represented in Canadian 
            government that it should have its own. 
          
 Both songs eventually claimed formal acceptance by the respective 
            goverments after being sung continually throughout World War I, each 
            about a hundred years after first appearance. Note that neither started 
            out to be national anthems. Unless the people identified with those 
            songs, the songs would never have become official national anthems. 
            It took almost exactly 100 years for "O Canada" to become official 
            and over 120 years for "Star Spangled Banner". 
          
 These songs did not shape national character; they are shaped by 
            national character. American-Canadian conflict was on its way to becoming 
            an institution over 50 years before Canada was officially formed. 
          
 If it seems late for any Canadian to take exception at "Star Spangled 
            Banner", it is worth noting that Canada did recently split off part 
            of the Northwest Territories to return to North American aboriginals. 
            Similar disputes are in arbitration regarding more useable parts of 
            the country, like parts of British Columbia that aren't covered in 
            permafrost. 
          
 This is not to say it's worth kicking up fuss now; the point is 
            to examine the common ways in which our conflicts are regularly reinforced. 
            A new US anthem celebrating the Alaskan panhandle victory wouldn't 
            go over well today; neither, I suppose, would a new Vietnamese anthem 
            celebrating the genius of Ho Chi Minh.